Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Concluding Thoughts

All in all, major initiatives are currently being taken to enhance interoperability among the various metadata schemas. Interoperability is a major issue, especially among digital collections, since metadata tends to be stored for use only by the institution that creates and maintains it. Thus, the driving force behind the development of metadata standards in the future will most likely be a desire for uniform access methodology across collections (Smiraglia, 2005). Union catalogs, cross-system searches, crosswalks, and metadata registries each attempt to address and overcome the prevalent barriers to semantic and/or syntactic interoperability. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that some degree of inconsistency or discrepancy shall continue to exist due to the very nature of different institutions creating and using different schemas. As for now, there is still no “one size fits all” universal bibliographic control (Younger, 1997).

References:

Smiraglia, R.P. (Ed.). (2005). Metadata: A cataloger’s primer. New York: The Haworth Information Press.
Younger, J. A. (1997). Resources description in the digital age. Library Trends, 45(3), 462-488. Retrieved July 3, 2008, from InfoTrac OneFile database.

1 comment:

Lafferty Dissemination Topic said...

You brought up a good point about interoperability. It is major problem with many disparate information systems. Advances in enterprise systems should take care of many of the problems but sharing outside a particular system may be a problem. Standards need to be created for the exchange of information if they do not exist. In health care, Health Level 7 is one such example in the healthcare arena. Is there such a collaborative agency in library science?